隱喻與認知 好書推薦
壯大夢想的隱喻與認知﹐內容的每一個細節卻都令人驚艷!
隱喻與認知曾在博客來 網路書店造成搶購熱潮。
看完心情愉快, 正能量滿滿, 大推! 在網路上很夯，人氣蠻不錯。
隱喻與認知是本不錯的語言學習，誠意推薦給大家看喔!
最新與最多的語言學習，每日都有特價商品推薦是網路書店購書最佳選擇！
真的不錯，內容精彩，好看的語言學習隱喻與認知全書的內容大意!
購買也很便利，很值得納入購物車，不需要特地跑到外面找。
總而言之，它的評價很高，總會覺得彷彿一伸出雙手便能擁抱全世界！
看完有一種說不出的感動，剛出版的時候我就已經在看了 ！
博客來,博客來網路書店,博客來網路書局,博客來書店,博客來網路書店歡迎您
商品訊息功能:
長期以來，隱喻只被認為是一種譬喻法，一種文學上的修辭技巧，然而這樣的想法，在仔細觀察生活週遭的語言使用後，很快就會被推翻。隱喻其實並不只是為潤飾而存在，它大量的存在於人類言談及思想中；我們習以為常的語言，其實反映了人類如何了解自己的語言與經驗。
隱喻是人類概念系統的一部分，許多我們思考的方式，我們所經驗的事物都是隱喻的某一種表徵；我們思考以及了解這個世界的方式，其實在某個層面上受到了限制，只是我們往往無所覺。本課程以日常生活的語言現象為基礎，藉由探索「隱喻」的本質與應用，帶領讀者一探人類思維模式的靈活運用，探索思想認知之奧秘，以及文化對人類思維模式的影響。
課程簡介
一、課程名稱：隱喻與認知
二、所屬領域：人文
三、學分數：2
四、任課教師：蘇以文
五、課程說明：
（一）本課程開授目的：本計畫擬透過開設通識課程的方式，以跨學科思考的方式帶領學生研討此經典之內容。本計畫擬由日常生活的語言現象為基礎，逐步帶領學生，進入人類思維模式及認知科學的世界。在1980所出版的Metaphors We Live By, Lakoff and Johnson為認知語言學的研究奠定了里程碑。我們希望藉此能使學生瞭解隱喻及思想的本質，及瞭解其在語言學及認知科學其他研究領域中的角色；使學生能瞭解語言及思想的譬喻性，及文化對人類思維模式的影響及互動關係。
（二）本課程共列11個講授單元，每一講授單元包括下列各項：
1. 講授內容摘要
2. 閱讀作業及思考問題
3. 參考讀物
4. 參考英語語料
六、教材：
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
七、課程進度
第一講?隱喻與思維的本質
Ch1Concepts We Live By
Ch2The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts
Ch3Metaphorical Systematicity: Highlighting and Hiding
第二講?概念的方位性與文化思維
Ch4Orientational Metaphors
Ch5Metaphor and Cultural Coherence
第三講對實體的感知與思維
Ch6 Ontological Metaphors
Ch7 Personification
Ch8 Metonymy
第四講概念系統的一致性
Ch9 Challenges to Metaphorical Coherence
Ch10? Some Further Examples
Ch11? The Partial Nature of Metaphorical Structuring
第五講結構性隱喻、譬喻性思維、一般性思維及其經驗基礎
Ch12How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded?
Ch13The Grounding of Structural Metaphors
Ch14Causation: Partly Emergent and Partly Metaphorical
第六講概念性隱喻、思維建構及經驗整體性
Ch15The Coherent Structuring of Experience
Ch16Metaphorical Coherence
Ch17Complex Coherence across Metaphors
第七講概念結構及基礎理論
Ch18Some Consequences for Theories of Conceptual Structure
第八講隱喻、思維與意義
Ch19Definition and Understanding
Ch20How Metaphor Can Give Meaning to Form
Ch21New Meaning
第九講意義與真實
Ch22The Creation of Similarity
Ch23Metaphor, Truth, and Action
Ch24Truth
第十講語言：客觀還是主觀？
Ch25The Myths of Objectivism and Subjectivism
Ch26The Myth of Objectivism in Western Philosophy and Linguistics
Ch27How Metaphor Reveals the Limitations of the Myth of Objectivism
Ch28Some Inadequacies of the Myth of Subjectivism
第十一講結語：語言與思維的經驗基礎
Ch29The Experientialist Alternative: Giving New Meaning to the Old Myths
Ch30Understanding
八? 基本參考書
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
九? 課外閱讀參考書目
．Ahrens, Kathleen. 2001. When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairing in the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In the Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Cheng-Chi University, Taiwan.
．Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
．Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.
．Borkin, Ann. 1985. Problems in Form and Function. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
．Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
．Cienki, Alan (1999). Metaphors and cultural models as profiles and bases. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., and Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 189-203. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
．Cooper, William E., and John Robert Ross. 1975. World order. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James San, and Timothy J. Vance, (eds.), Functionalism. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
．Dahl, Oyvind. 1995. When the future comes from behind: Malagasy and other time concepts and some consequences for communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19:2, 197-210.
．Davidson, Donald. 1978. What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5:1, 31-47.
．Frege, Gottlob. 1966. On Sense and Reference. In P. Geach and M. Black, (eds.), Translation from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Balckwell.
．Gallagher, Shaun. 1995. Body schema and intentionality. In Jose Bermedez, Noami Eilan, Anthony Marcel (eds.), The Body and the Self, 225-244. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
．Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66:377-88.
．Hill, Clifford A. 1982. Up/down, front/back, left/right: A constrastive study of Hausa and English In J. Weissenbord and W. Klein (eds.), Here and There: Cross-linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration, 13-42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
．Jackendoff, Ray S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition－Chapter 1: Semantic Structure and Conceptual Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 3-22.
．──. 1990. Semantic Structures－Chapter 1: Overview of Conceptual Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 7-41.
．Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
．Klein, Harriet. 1987. The future precedes the past: Time in Toba In Word, vol. 38:3.
．Koffka, Kurt. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Lund Humphries.
．Kovecses, Zoltan. 1986. Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love. A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
．──. 1990. Emotion Concepts. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
．Lakoff, George. 1972. Linguistics and Natural Logic. In Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
．──. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago:? University of Chicago Press.
．──. 1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemase Cognitive Linguistics 1:1, 39-74.
．──. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony, (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
．──. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
．Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1981. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. In D.A. Norman, (ed.), Perspectives on Cognitive Science, 193-206. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
．Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
．Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphors. Chicago: Chicago Press.
．Lakoff, George, and Rafael Nueez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
．Montague, Richard. 1974. Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
．Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
．Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. Human categorization. In N. Warren, (ed.), Advances in Cross-cultural Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
．Su, Lily I-wen. 1999a. To “run” a marriage: Conceptualization of marriage in current Chinese. AISB’99 Workshop on Metaphor, Artificial Intelligence & Cognition. Edinburgh University.
．──. 1999b. Thought as food: Conceptual metaphors? in Chinese. Working Papers in Linguistic, Vol. 2 (Dec 1999), 199-224. National Taiwan University.
．──.? 1999c. Metaphorical extension and lexical meaning. The 13th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation. Taipei.
．──. 2002a. What can metaphor tell us about culture?”Language and Linguistics 3(3): 589-614, Taipei: Academia Sinica.
．── . 2002b. What can metaphor tell us about conceptuali- zation and culture? Proceedings of the Symposium on Selected NSC Projects on General Linguistics 1998-2000. National Taiwan University, Taipei.
．Turner, Mark. 1987. Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
．──. 1996. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
．Vosniadou, Stella. and Andrew. Ortony. 1989. Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In Stella Vosniadon and Andrew Ortony, (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
．Yu, Ning. 2001. What does our face mean to use Pragmatics & Cognition 9:1, 1–36.
．Yu, Ning. 2002. Body and emotion: Body parts in Chinese expression of emotion. In Nick Enfield and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.) The Body in Description of Emotion: Cross-Linguistic Studies, special issue of Pragmatics and Cognition 10(1/2): 341–367
作者簡介
蘇以文教授
乃夏威夷大學語言學博士，現任國立臺灣大學語言學研究所教授。目前的研究重點為言談分析、語用學及認知語言學，尤重人類思維在語言現象中的體現及其與文化之間的相關性。
博客來網路書店
隱喻與認知推薦，隱喻與認知討論，隱喻與認知比較評比，隱喻與認知開箱文，隱喻與認知部落客
隱喻與認知那裡買，隱喻與認知價格，隱喻與認知特賣會，隱喻與認知評比，隱喻與認知部落客 推薦
內容來自YAHOO新聞
柯文哲不再獨享兩經濟艙位 多了副市長
博客來
博客來,博客來網路書店,博客來網路書局,博客來書店,博客來網路書店歡迎您
3AA9F9D64C63A99C
 |
壯大夢想的隱喻與認知﹐內容的每一個細節卻都令人驚艷!
隱喻與認知曾在博客來 網路書店造成搶購熱潮。
看完心情愉快, 正能量滿滿, 大推! 在網路上很夯，人氣蠻不錯。
隱喻與認知是本不錯的語言學習，誠意推薦給大家看喔!
最新與最多的語言學習，每日都有特價商品推薦是網路書店購書最佳選擇！
真的不錯，內容精彩，好看的語言學習隱喻與認知全書的內容大意!
購買也很便利，很值得納入購物車，不需要特地跑到外面找。
總而言之，它的評價很高，總會覺得彷彿一伸出雙手便能擁抱全世界！
作者： 蘇以文
新功能介紹- 出版社：國立臺灣大學出版中心
新功能介紹 - 出版日期：2005/03/10
- 語言：繁體中文
看完有一種說不出的感動，剛出版的時候我就已經在看了 ！
博客來,博客來網路書店,博客來網路書局,博客來書店,博客來網路書店歡迎您
商品訊息功能:
長期以來，隱喻只被認為是一種譬喻法，一種文學上的修辭技巧，然而這樣的想法，在仔細觀察生活週遭的語言使用後，很快就會被推翻。隱喻其實並不只是為潤飾而存在，它大量的存在於人類言談及思想中；我們習以為常的語言，其實反映了人類如何了解自己的語言與經驗。
隱喻是人類概念系統的一部分，許多我們思考的方式，我們所經驗的事物都是隱喻的某一種表徵；我們思考以及了解這個世界的方式，其實在某個層面上受到了限制，只是我們往往無所覺。本課程以日常生活的語言現象為基礎，藉由探索「隱喻」的本質與應用，帶領讀者一探人類思維模式的靈活運用，探索思想認知之奧秘，以及文化對人類思維模式的影響。
課程簡介
一、課程名稱：隱喻與認知
二、所屬領域：人文
三、學分數：2
四、任課教師：蘇以文
五、課程說明：
（一）本課程開授目的：本計畫擬透過開設通識課程的方式，以跨學科思考的方式帶領學生研討此經典之內容。本計畫擬由日常生活的語言現象為基礎，逐步帶領學生，進入人類思維模式及認知科學的世界。在1980所出版的Metaphors We Live By, Lakoff and Johnson為認知語言學的研究奠定了里程碑。我們希望藉此能使學生瞭解隱喻及思想的本質，及瞭解其在語言學及認知科學其他研究領域中的角色；使學生能瞭解語言及思想的譬喻性，及文化對人類思維模式的影響及互動關係。
（二）本課程共列11個講授單元，每一講授單元包括下列各項：
1. 講授內容摘要
2. 閱讀作業及思考問題
3. 參考讀物
4. 參考英語語料
六、教材：
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
七、課程進度
第一講?隱喻與思維的本質
Ch1Concepts We Live By
Ch2The Systematicity of Metaphorical Concepts
Ch3Metaphorical Systematicity: Highlighting and Hiding
第二講?概念的方位性與文化思維
Ch4Orientational Metaphors
Ch5Metaphor and Cultural Coherence
第三講對實體的感知與思維
Ch6 Ontological Metaphors
Ch7 Personification
Ch8 Metonymy
第四講概念系統的一致性
Ch9 Challenges to Metaphorical Coherence
Ch10? Some Further Examples
Ch11? The Partial Nature of Metaphorical Structuring
第五講結構性隱喻、譬喻性思維、一般性思維及其經驗基礎
Ch12How Is Our Conceptual System Grounded?
Ch13The Grounding of Structural Metaphors
Ch14Causation: Partly Emergent and Partly Metaphorical
第六講概念性隱喻、思維建構及經驗整體性
Ch15The Coherent Structuring of Experience
Ch16Metaphorical Coherence
Ch17Complex Coherence across Metaphors
第七講概念結構及基礎理論
Ch18Some Consequences for Theories of Conceptual Structure
第八講隱喻、思維與意義
Ch19Definition and Understanding
Ch20How Metaphor Can Give Meaning to Form
Ch21New Meaning
第九講意義與真實
Ch22The Creation of Similarity
Ch23Metaphor, Truth, and Action
Ch24Truth
第十講語言：客觀還是主觀？
Ch25The Myths of Objectivism and Subjectivism
Ch26The Myth of Objectivism in Western Philosophy and Linguistics
Ch27How Metaphor Reveals the Limitations of the Myth of Objectivism
Ch28Some Inadequacies of the Myth of Subjectivism
第十一講結語：語言與思維的經驗基礎
Ch29The Experientialist Alternative: Giving New Meaning to the Old Myths
Ch30Understanding
八? 基本參考書
Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
九? 課外閱讀參考書目
．Ahrens, Kathleen. 2001. When love is not digested: Underlying reasons for source to target domain pairing in the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In the Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Cheng-Chi University, Taiwan.
．Black, Max. 1962. Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
．Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.
．Borkin, Ann. 1985. Problems in Form and Function. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
．Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
．Cienki, Alan (1999). Metaphors and cultural models as profiles and bases. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr., and Gerard J. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, 189-203. Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
．Cooper, William E., and John Robert Ross. 1975. World order. In Robin E. Grossman, L. James San, and Timothy J. Vance, (eds.), Functionalism. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
．Dahl, Oyvind. 1995. When the future comes from behind: Malagasy and other time concepts and some consequences for communication. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 19:2, 197-210.
．Davidson, Donald. 1978. What metaphors mean. Critical Inquiry 5:1, 31-47.
．Frege, Gottlob. 1966. On Sense and Reference. In P. Geach and M. Black, (eds.), Translation from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Balckwell.
．Gallagher, Shaun. 1995. Body schema and intentionality. In Jose Bermedez, Noami Eilan, Anthony Marcel (eds.), The Body and the Self, 225-244. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
．Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66:377-88.
．Hill, Clifford A. 1982. Up/down, front/back, left/right: A constrastive study of Hausa and English In J. Weissenbord and W. Klein (eds.), Here and There: Cross-linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration, 13-42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
．Jackendoff, Ray S. 1983. Semantics and Cognition－Chapter 1: Semantic Structure and Conceptual Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 3-22.
．──. 1990. Semantic Structures－Chapter 1: Overview of Conceptual Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press, 7-41.
．Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
．Klein, Harriet. 1987. The future precedes the past: Time in Toba In Word, vol. 38:3.
．Koffka, Kurt. 1935. Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Lund Humphries.
．Kovecses, Zoltan. 1986. Metaphors of Anger, Pride, and Love. A Lexical Approach to the Structure of Concepts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
．──. 1990. Emotion Concepts. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
．Lakoff, George. 1972. Linguistics and Natural Logic. In Donald Davidson and Gilbert Harman, (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
．──. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago:? University of Chicago Press.
．──. 1990. The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemase Cognitive Linguistics 1:1, 39-74.
．──. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In A. Ortony, (ed.), Metaphor and Thought. 2nd. ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
．──. 1996. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don't. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
．Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1981. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. In D.A. Norman, (ed.), Perspectives on Cognitive Science, 193-206. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
．Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
．Lakoff, George and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphors. Chicago: Chicago Press.
．Lakoff, George, and Rafael Nueez. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
．Montague, Richard. 1974. Formal Philosophy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
．Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London: Oxford University Press.
．Rosch, Eleanor. 1977. Human categorization. In N. Warren, (ed.), Advances in Cross-cultural Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
．Su, Lily I-wen. 1999a. To “run” a marriage: Conceptualization of marriage in current Chinese. AISB’99 Workshop on Metaphor, Artificial Intelligence & Cognition. Edinburgh University.
．──. 1999b. Thought as food: Conceptual metaphors? in Chinese. Working Papers in Linguistic, Vol. 2 (Dec 1999), 199-224. National Taiwan University.
．──.? 1999c. Metaphorical extension and lexical meaning. The 13th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information, and Computation. Taipei.
．──. 2002a. What can metaphor tell us about culture?”Language and Linguistics 3(3): 589-614, Taipei: Academia Sinica.
．── . 2002b. What can metaphor tell us about conceptuali- zation and culture? Proceedings of the Symposium on Selected NSC Projects on General Linguistics 1998-2000. National Taiwan University, Taipei.
．Turner, Mark. 1987. Death Is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
．──. 1996. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
．Vosniadou, Stella. and Andrew. Ortony. 1989. Similarity and analogical reasoning: A synthesis. In Stella Vosniadon and Andrew Ortony, (eds.), Similarity and Analogical Reasoning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
．Yu, Ning. 2001. What does our face mean to use Pragmatics & Cognition 9:1, 1–36.
．Yu, Ning. 2002. Body and emotion: Body parts in Chinese expression of emotion. In Nick Enfield and Anna Wierzbicka (eds.) The Body in Description of Emotion: Cross-Linguistic Studies, special issue of Pragmatics and Cognition 10(1/2): 341–367
作者簡介
蘇以文教授
乃夏威夷大學語言學博士，現任國立臺灣大學語言學研究所教授。目前的研究重點為言談分析、語用學及認知語言學，尤重人類思維在語言現象中的體現及其與文化之間的相關性。
黃金誘惑：貫穿人類歷史的貪婪符號 | 黑金石油：多空雙向交易投資新契機，原油ETF完全攻略 | 金甲蟲之路：黃金白銀實物投資手冊 | |||
１個指標賺遍全世界：ＦＢＩ教你讀基金術 | 創投基金送你一億 | 基金教母蕭碧燕基金贏家實戰DVD(增訂版) |
作者： 蘇以文
新功能介紹- 出版社：國立臺灣大學出版中心
新功能介紹 - 出版日期：2005/03/10
- 語言：繁體中文
隱喻與認知
|
博客來網路書店
高橋流簡報 | 全方位企畫案撰寫全書 | 經營企畫書完全手冊：關鍵問題 - 撰寫技巧 - 參考範例（修訂版） | |||
如何讓商品暢銷又長銷？日本國民零食POCKY品牌經理教你，商品由黑轉紅、熱賣50年的行銷企劃力！ | 企劃實用祕技 | 為什麼我寫的企劃案沒有說服力？：6分鐘學會充分傳達內容、情感的共感寫作法 |
隱喻與認知推薦，隱喻與認知討論，隱喻與認知比較評比，隱喻與認知開箱文，隱喻與認知部落客
隱喻與認知那裡買，隱喻與認知價格，隱喻與認知特賣會，隱喻與認知評比，隱喻與認知部落客 推薦
內容來自YAHOO新聞
柯文哲不再獨享兩經濟艙位 多了副市長
（中央社記者游凱翔、黃俊諺台北17日電）台北市長柯文哲率團赴上海參與雙城論壇，雖仍維持「不走公務門」一貫作風，但與上次出訪韓國相較下，這次不再獨享2個經濟艙座位，身旁多了副市長鄧家基。
台北上海城市論壇17日至19日在上海舉行，包含市議員在內，台北市府代表團約30人，下午2時從台北松山機場出發，預計下午4時10分抵達上海虹橋機場。
這次上海行程柯文哲仍維持上次出訪韓國的一貫作風，除了「不走公務門」外，也堅持搭乘經濟艙，但這次不同地方在於，這趟行程也借鏡上次訪韓教訓，不再獨享2個座位，身旁多了鄧家基相伴，避免惹議。
這次隨行官員中，除了鄧家基、台北產發局長林崇傑、文化局長倪重華、台北市議員約30人隨團外，和碩董事長童子賢、華碩雲端總經理吳漢章、大學眼鏡總院長林丕容也隨行參與；對外界批評帶著林丕容赴上海做生意是「柯朝新貴」，柯文哲僅回應，林丕容懂當地人文。
媒體追問，如果陸方稱呼你是「中國台北市長」怎麼辦？柯文哲先是回應，對方不會問這種題目吧？緊接著說，「不回答假設性問題」；至於若與國台辦主任張志軍、中共上海市委書記韓正會面，是否會討論什麼議題？柯文哲說，「不曉得，平常心看待就好」。
柯文哲上午出席「市政小蜜蜂嗡嗡嗡體驗營」開幕式時，神情略顯疲憊，甚至向台下學生抱怨長達20分鐘，指「現在是媒體治國的時代」，說蘇迪勒風災後的復原進度「絕對沒有比較慢」，最後還意有所指說，「死人才追求歷史定位，活人追定位是白癡事，你知道我在說誰」，此話一出，在網路引起論戰，網友笑稱，「又失言了」。
登機前有媒體詢問，上午是不是心情不太好？柯文哲笑答，「有時好天有時下雨，不是每天都需要情緒高昂」；他也感嘆的說，過完年後才第2次回新竹老家，都把爸媽丟在新竹，真是糟糕。柯文哲隨後與幕僚托運行李，準備登機。1040817
新聞來源https://tw.news.yahoo.com/柯文哲不再獨享兩經濟艙位-多了副市長-091616243.html
|
隱喻與認知
博客來,博客來網路書店,博客來網路書局,博客來書店,博客來網路書店歡迎您
- 賺到買到技職國文 POD評鑑開箱 博客來網路書店 賺到買到技職國文 POD評鑑開箱
- 會員好康Windows 10超級練功坊指名首選 博客來網路書店 會員好康Windows 10超級練功坊指名首選
- 非逛不可這樣就OK啦！日語文法（附1MP3）比較使用 博客來網路書店 非逛不可這樣就OK啦！日語文法（附1MP3）比較使用
3AA9F9D64C63A99C
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
